During the past few years, there has been an increase in demand for wearable devices from an audience both young and old. Some medical devices provide preventative functions, such as monitoring disorders, enabling early intervention and avoidance of complications. Other devices are reactive and can detect if an elderly patient has fallen, needs emergency assistance, has wandered outside a specific perimeter, or needs a reminder to take prescribed medications at the appropriate time of the day. Still other wearables allow consumers of all ages to monitor their own health and fitness, whether to help them lose weight, reach exercise/fitness goals or sleep better.
There are many examples of wearable devices that feature sensors. Some use “skin-friendly” adhesive while other examples are wristbands and shoe insoles that can measure the progress of patients and athletes. Examples of the functions include blood glucose meters, blood pressure meters, cardiac monitors and ECGs. What was once viewed as a “nice to have” device has now turned into a “must have” device to track, monitor and protect us in our everyday life.
Communication with the wearable medical device is typically a wireless telemetry function, which utilizes either Bluetooth, Wi-Fi or cellular data capabilities to sync data back to a centralized monitoring program. From a power consumption standpoint, the wearable device needs appropriate and adequate power to collect, process, and sync the functional data, as well as power a wireless transceiver.
There are several different means in which a wearable medical device can be affixed to a patient. Some are placed on the skin using adhesives or affixed to clothing with sensors attached to the body. Others are worn on the wrist (or chest) like a watch. The common theme with a wearable device and its rechargeable power source is it must be small and thin. For the rechargeable power source, the additional requirements usually include an irregular (and custom) shape, only a few millimeters in thickness, and potentially mounted on a curved surface. Given these constraints, the wearable device will typically be powered by a single cell, much like a cell phone. Most wearable devices utilize Lithium Polymer batteries, given their unique characteristics that will be outlined below.
Introduction to Lithium Polymer
Li-ion cells come in three basic form factors: cylindrical, prismatic and polymer cells. Cylindrical 18650 (18 mm dia. 65 mm length) cells are used not only in notebooks but also power tools, e-bikes, EVs and other industrial applications. Prismatic or rectangular shaped cells are made with Aluminum cans and are available in a myriad of sizes and are generally used in the same applications as polymer cells. Prismatic cells come in a variety of x,y footprints and with thickness typically ranging from about 4 mm to about 12 mm. Some of the most common footprints for prismatic cells are 34 by 50 mm, 60 by 80 mm, 38 by 64 mm with thickness ranging from 4 mm to 10 mm.
Lithium polymer cells, sometimes called laminate or pouch cells, are available in custom footprint sizes, which makes them appealing to wearable device manufacturers. They can be very thin or quite large depending on their intended use. The primary advantage of Lithium polymer batteries is the variety of form factors available. Polymer cells differ from prismatic cells in two key respects, one being the cell construction and the second being the electrolyte used. A polymer cell enclosure is an Aluminum foil in between two layers of polypropylene that is typically vacuumed sealed with the edges heat sealed. Additionally, the positive and negative terminals are tabs that protrude through the cell. The electrolyte is either a gel or polymer as opposed to the liquid electrolyte used in a prismatic or cylindrical cell. Cell capacities can range anywhere from 50 mAh for a small cell such as for a Bluetooth headset, up to 20 Ah or more for an electric vehicle battery.
In recent years, Lithium polymer cells have been embraced by the consumer equipment manufacturers. Mobile phones, tablets and notebooks utilize polymer cells. Although still more expensive than cylindrical cells, this consumer demand for Lithium polymer cells has substantially reduced the cost per Watt-hour for Lithium polymer cells. Figure 1 indicates the leading suppliers of polymer batteries (Source: Avicenne Energy, March 2015).
Advantages of Lithium Polymer Batteries
The lack of a metal can allow more flexibility to manufacture custom sizes based on the constraints of the wearable device. While internally the cells are very similar to prismatic cells (i.e. the electrodes could be made from the same manufacturing lines), the enclosure provides flexibility to more easily create new sizes. The laminate material can easily be slit to different lengths and widths as opposed to having a cylindrical or prismatic can that requires new tooling to manufacture a new can size. Also, the heat sealing process is easily modified compared to crimping for cylindrical cells. This flexibility in the size options makes Lithium polymers a great choice for wearable devices.
New variants of Lithium polymer cells have been introduced into the marketplace. Several vendors offer Lithium polymer cells that deliver high currents, while other vendors offer cells that operate in high-temperature environments. These new variants expand that range of applications where Lithium polymer cells can be used.
Lithium polymer cells are offered in a myriad of sizes. A high-volume consumer device manufacturer typically uses a custom Lithium polymer cell, ensuring that the device has a maximum amount of battery material filling the available space allocated for the battery. However, there is a hidden issue with the popularity of Lithium polymer in consumer devices. Medical devices, wearable or otherwise, typically have a product life cycle of seven years. The availability of a Lithium polymer cell can be short, especially if their annual volume is driven by one or two consumer devices with two or three-year product life spans. A medical device manufacturer with lower volumes must be cautious when selecting a cell size for this reason. The manufacturer needs to understand the length of their product life, and cautiously select their cell manufacturer and their cell.
Challenges with Lithium Polymer Batteries
Due to the ease of manufacturing Lithium polymer cells, many new manufacturers are entering the market. However, while making a Lithium polymer cell seems ‘easier’ on the surface, making a high-quality polymer cell has proven a challenge for many of these manufacturers. The industry has seen many quality problems owing to poor quality processes both in the cell and battery pack manufacturing. Lithium polymer cells are susceptible particularly to moisture. Any moisture in the cell remaining after manufacturing or later, due to ingress of humidity because of poor sealing of the edges or tab terrace, will later result in gassing and swelling of the cells. This is a common problem and continues to be a challenge for lower tier manufacturers. Cycling of the cells can also cause swelling due to poor electrode mechanical integrity or electrolyte/electrode interactions. Additionally, in testing many manufacturers of polymer cells, there is a big disparity in performance and cycle life among the suppliers (See Figure 2).
Another disadvantage of a Lithium polymer cell compared to a cylindrical cell is less volumetric energy density. This is because cylindrical cells will not bulge due to their extremely strong shape, so very high electrode densities can be achieved with metal cans. Also, the selection of materials is less restrictive because small amounts of gas produced by a cylindrical cell has no effect on its performance or shape.
The same is not true of Lithium polymer cells. However, this disadvantage in energy density can be somewhat overcome by an advantage in battery packing density owing to the lost space between cylindrical cells. Lithium polymer cells tend to have better cycle life than cylindrical cells because they are not so tightly constrained; allowing the electrodes to expand and contract more freely during cycling reduces the mechanical stress on the electrodes. Figure 3 presents a cycle life chart of a 1C charge, 1C discharge cycle life of a 2.7 Ah cell. It is still retaining 90 percent after 500 cycles. There are newer designs coming that should exceed 1,000 cycles.
As with all Li-ion cells, overcharge also has to be prevented. Overcharge can result in significant capacity loss even at levels just above a typical 4.2 V charge. Higher levels of over-voltage can result in safety issues as the cathode breaks down and internal cell reactions escalate into thermal runaway. There are differences in the safety mechanisms, particularly between cylindrical cells and polymer cells. Polymer cells do not have an integral pressure activated current interrupt devices (CID) as 18650s do that help prevent overcharge as the gas pressure builds. Traditionally 18650s also include internal PTCs to stop operation when high current/temperature thresholds are exceeded whereas polymer cells do not have this. This functionality can be added either with PTC or thermal fuse to the battery in combination with its safety circuit.
Lithium polymer cells offer many attractive benefits, including the ability to develop smaller, thinner medical devices and the flexibility to create a size that truly optimizes form, fit, and function of your device. However, the phrase “Buyer Beware” is never truer than when it is applied to Lithium polymer cells. The variability in quality, safety and performance require experience and diligence to ensure the standards expected of a wearable medical product are met.
This article was originally published in Battery Power Magazine, May 2015